reducing shingle exposure

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-05-2009, 06:40 AM   #31
Slate and Metal Roofer
 
tinner666's Avatar
 
Trade: Copper and slate roofer
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 432
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


"Maybey i can just put a 1inch slot in the vertical leg of the 1 pc head flashing inbetween the units to let it drain without having to wrap it around the heads?"
You could, BUT, you will be creating a 'potential' weak link in the system.

My technique? I take 1-3 pieces of 12" metal and mock up 1-10 senarios before making a final decision. And a 6' piece never quite fits like that 12" mock-up!
I can't go back from this answer box, but I think thye were 2' skylights. That's only about 60" of back pan, with less than 4' of roof above it. Shouldn't be a problem.

tinner666 is offline  
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ContractorTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!

Old 02-05-2009, 06:50 AM   #32
Slate and Metal Roofer
 
tinner666's Avatar
 
Trade: Copper and slate roofer
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 432
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


Quote:
Originally Posted by tomstruble View Post
this is the roof that im looking at sno on the roof but you get the idea.She wants to change out the sky lites and re do the roof,i was hoping to get some venting at the wall but that hard coat stucco scares me and the left side of that window dont look to good any advice?
After going back, I'm more confused. Are they 4' across? One view looks like 2'ers. other looks like 3-4'ers???
Only 38" to the wall. I'd still go full lenght.
Reason? They're not like a chimney between them where water can run around a back-pan. You join 2 pans there, no caulk in the world will work long-term, even with hemmed ends.
This is one of the very few that I might end consider a 1"-1-1/2" tall water diverter above the pan, about 6" longer on each end, come to think of it. You would sleep at night knowing that no amount of rain would ever back up enough to 'over-run' the top of the back-pan, which looks like it could be 4" tall for 6-8'.

Overkill, but bullet-proof.
tinner666 is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 07:38 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
tomstruble's Avatar
 
Trade: roofing and siding contractor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: west milford n.j.
Posts: 109
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


they are 42'' wide and i see what your saying ,do you think i should make the diverter 2 pc pulling it up in the center to get some pitch to the outside of the skylites?
tomstruble is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 08:44 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
tomstruble's Avatar
 
Trade: roofing and siding contractor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: west milford n.j.
Posts: 109
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


because of the roof pitch velux wants a raised curb
tomstruble is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 03:34 PM   #35
Slate and Metal Roofer
 
tinner666's Avatar
 
Trade: Copper and slate roofer
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 432
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


I know they want a raised curb. I' haven't seen any problems with 3/12 roofs yet.

I would pitch a diverter about an 1" or 1-1/2" each way. It's only a 3' run, but that is a lot of snow above them. Put the diverter 8" to 1' higher and a monsoon won't casue it to leak.

Last edited by tinner666; 01-30-2010 at 08:33 PM.
tinner666 is offline  
Old 02-05-2009, 06:01 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
tomstruble's Avatar
 
Trade: roofing and siding contractor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: west milford n.j.
Posts: 109
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


thank you Frank
tomstruble is offline  
Old 01-30-2010, 08:57 AM   #37
jason
 
Jasonthompson's Avatar
 
Trade: Roofing/Siding/Gutters
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Atlanta ga
Posts: 45
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


u shingled that 2/12 section of roof??? are u crazy shingles are not made for that low of pitch. I would of used a peal and stick or single-ply system. Things that are made for low slope.
Jasonthompson is offline  
Old 05-07-2011, 02:19 AM   #38
Junior Member
 
kimboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 27
Default

Re: reducing shingle exposure


I was sure of that Ed. I was wondering if he had noticed any on the inside. I'm not much of a wordsmith, am I? Good thing I roof better than I talk or type, eh?
kimboy is offline  


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Join Now... It's Fast and FREE!

Privacy Badge
I am a professional contractor
I am a DIY Homeowner
ContractorTalk.com is for
PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTORS ONLY!

At ContractorTalk.com we cater exlusivly to professional contractors who make their living as a contractor. Knowing that many homeowners and DIYers are looking for a community to call home, we've created www.DIYChatroom.com DIY Chatroom is full of helpful advices and perfect for DIY homeowners.

Redirecing in 10 seconds
No Thanks
terms of service

Already Have an Account?


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0